This gives them a right to have some control over who gets to join. We will move beyond analogies with sports teams and other smaller groups, working out what truth is in these comparisons and what makes them misleading when accepted uncritically. Should we, for example, boycott products until those selling them provide assurances about how they were made, even if that bumps the price up a bit? What kind of people made the products you own, and how much were they paid? It’s easy to think of examples of customs or patterns of behaviour from other societies that shock us deeply. We all like to be free to say what we think – nobody should have the right to censor us, or to threaten us with harm if we don’t shut up. A Taliban tribesman kills his daughter for taking an unsupervised walk with a young man. Moral Dilemmas in Modern Business Oliver Maloney The essential dilemma facing Christians in the spheres of busi ness and commerce is how and if the moral rhetoric of Chris tianity can be turned into the practical conduct of business affairs. It’s tempting to draw analogies between whole countries and smaller groups: think about a footie team faced with a number of players desperate to be drafted, or a university admitting students. Cliques & Bullying — Julia’s best friend has turned against her and is now organizing the other girls … Sign up to read our regular email newsletters, Minimising the suffering of other life forms is a laudable goal – but there’s also human well-being to consider, Tweaking genes to prevent your child dying early from a genetic disorder would be acceptable to most people, but we need to ask how far we should go. Are we really in control in the first place, like a footie team controls its squad, even if we keep migrants out? If, in the situation of a moral dilemma, one decides to assign priority to one principle (e.g. However, the strength of the message remains the same. After all, boycotting a product may just put workers out of a job. Some people would like to see restrictions on violent video games, and pornography. How about the conditions under which they worked? To some extent this is true, but we’re also enormously conformist. Therefore, I have posted 10 more, which I think will be more thought provoking and agonizing than my first list. Chances are you know little or nothing about where the item comes from, how it was made, and by whom. He thinks he was obliged to do so. Can forgiveness ever be premature, or conversely, withheld for too long? After all, boycotting a product may just put workers out of a job. But at what cost? We all know about fires in India’s textile factories, and the low wages paid to those working on China’s laptop assembly lines. The methods of philosophy may be ancient, but they remain as relevant as ever when it comes to life’s difficult questions. Here are a few contemporary moral issues. In this way, thinking about forgiveness promises to enrich our understanding both of our personal lives, and of our institutions. Is blame supposed to trigger a response, such as repentance, that then justifies forgiveness? One place to start is by asking why freedom is worth having in the first place. Very often, we go with the first option for a while before moving onto the second – we blame, and then we forgive.The idea around forgiveness play a central role in our institutions as well as our private lives. Philosophers have long defended free speech on grounds that a society that protects new ideas will do better in the long run. But who will take responsibility for their actions? Take a look at what you’re wearing, and think about what sort of hairstyle you have, and whether you have worn makeup today or would never dream of wearing it. After establishing some of the key concepts in contemporary virtue ethics and elaborating on the structure and problem of the concept of moral dilemmas, the remaining four chapters will Please refer to our Privacy Policy and Privacy Statement for the University of Melbourne Website for information in relation to the broader practices in relation to the collection, use handling and disclosure of personal information by the University. Hit and Run. We all like to be free to say what we think – nobody should have the right to censor us, or to threaten us with harm if we don’t shut up. It’s tempting to draw analogies between whole countries and smaller groups: think about a footie team faced with a number of players desperate to be drafted, or a university admitting students. By the comments submitted, I realize many did not feel that they had sufficient debatable merit. Scientific research may lead to benefits and advances, but they seem to go hand-in-hand with death and destruction. Please tell us what you would do in each scenario via comments. If these don’t contribute to an exchange of ideas, then perhaps there is a case for distinguishing these forms of expressions from those where someone is trying to make a serious point, even if others find it difficult to hear.While there will always be disagreement about particular cases, we might still draw the conclusion that an entitlement to say what one likes comes with at least some obligation to try and defend it. Are countries the same? As companies operate across diverse cultural and legal frameworks, moral dilemmas arise in labor standards, marketing practices, environment, corruption and human rights. Does this mean that it is incoherent, or even wrong, to forgive people who do not repent, or who die before getting the chance? Where we end up depends on which Faustian bargains we are willing to strike. Dilemmas are dilemmas because they are, well, dilemmas. Footie teams and universities have an interest in shaping their own identities and pursuing certain standards. But what are the actual arguments for why a country should have an entitlement to keep people out, particularly people in great need? There are two things you can do in response – you can be angry and treat the perpetrator in a way that reflect this, or you can forgive them and treat them as you might have done so before they did what they did. The University would seek your prior written consent before using your personal information for any purpose other than that which is described above and before disclosing your personal information to any third party.