Nurses, particularly those transitioning into clinical practice, may require assistance to enhance their clinical judgment skills. Purpose: This study was done to evaluate the Lasater Clinical Judgement Rubric for use with Korents. Journal toc [Kostenfrei] Methods: Methodological design study conducted at a public institution of higher education in the southeast region of Brazil. By continuing you agree to the use of cookies. Dimensionality validity by confirmatory factorial analysis (CFA) obtained results of composite reliability (CR) above 0.7, and average variance extracted (AVE) higher than 0.5 in all phases. Next, was collection of data on the evaluation of psychometric properties with self-application by 179 students. Purpose: This study was done to evaluate the Lasater Clinical Judgement Rubric for use with Korents. Conclusion: The evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the rubric showed evidence of reliability and construct validity of the instrument for measuring the development of nursing students’ clinical judgment. The purpose of this article is to describe how the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric … [ Links ] 28. To that end, my secondary goal is to support, collaborate with, and mentor faculty colleagues to do same. reliability and validity of data from the Lasater Clinical Judg-ment Rubric (LCJR) using human patient simulation. Conclusion: The evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the rubric showed evidence of reliability and construct validity of the instrument for measuring the development of nursing students{\textquoteright} clinical judgment.". This tool comprises 11 items in four areas: recognition, interpretation, response and reflection. Reliability and validity of the lasater clinical judgment rubric – Brazilian version. Methods: A nts. Assessing the reliability, validity, and use of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric: three approaches. Hyunsook Shin [Author], Child Health Nursing Research Participants were grouped in junior (1st and 2nd terms n=115) and senior (3rd and 4th terms n=64) students. The Reliability and Validity of the Lasater Clinical Judgement Rubric in Korean Nursing Students . Stability was verified by test-retest (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient – ICC: 0.88). Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 11(1), 44-51. Morais, SCRV, Nunes, JGP, Lasater, K, De Barros, ALBL & De Carvalho, EC 2018, '. For internal consistency, Cronbach’s α score was .884 and intraclass correlation coefficient was .839, which established reliability. Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.". The DARE2-patient safety rubric was developed for the performance evaluation of final year nursing students. The following psychometric properties were analyzed: discriminant validity, reliability and dimensionality. Kathleen L. Lasater, Ed.D.,R.N., A.N.E.F., F.A.A.N. Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability and validity of the lasater clinical judgment rubric – Brazilian version'. Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric Bussard – Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric Scoring Sheet. Newly graduated nurses show lacking skills and competences regarding the ability to make appropriate clinical assessment of acute, complex care situations. title = "Reliability and validity of the lasater clinical judgment rubric – Brazilian version". The discriminant validity of the factorial model by the Fornell-Larcker criterion and cross loadings confirmed the theoretical structure of the rubric original version. The discriminant validity of the factorial model by the Fornell-Larcker criterion and cross loadings confirmed the theoretical structure of the rubric original version. All rights reserved. The results showed that the LCJR (S) was both qualitatively relevant and quantitatively reliable. The Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) was developed to evaluate simulation experience based on Benner’s seminal novice-to-expert model [1, 17] and Tanner’s clinical judgment model . The Reliability and Validity of the Lasater Clinical Judgement Rubric in Korean Nursing Students. The Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) as described in Ashcraft, et al. Participants were grouped in junior (1st and 2nd terms n=115) and senior (3rd and 4th terms n=64) students. Dimensionality validity by confirmatory factorial analysis (CFA) obtained results of composite reliability (CR) above 0.7, and average variance extracted (AVE) higher than 0.5 in all phases. Internal consistency was obtained for the global instrument (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.899) and for phases of Noticing (α=0.75), Interpreting (α=0.64), Responding (α=0.78) and Reflecting (α=0.63). Together they form a unique fingerprint. Methods: A methodological study was used to validate the rubric developed by Lasater to assess clinical judgment during nursing simulation. Clinical Learning Environment Comparison Survey(used in NCSBN study) Leighton, K. (2015). First, a high correlation of a simulation evaluation instrument from the literature: among items reflects good internal consistency but tells us the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR; Lasater, little about the validity of the measure. Dimensionality validity by confirmatory factorial analysis (CFA) obtained results of composite reliability (CR) above 0.7, and average variance extracted (AVE) higher than 0.5 in all phases. author = "Morais, {Sheila Coelho Ramalho Vasconcelos} and Nunes, {Janaina Gomes Perbone} and Kathie Lasater and {De Barros}, {Alba L{\'u}cia Bottura Leite} and {De Carvalho}, {Emilia Campos}". N1 - Publisher Copyright: Methods: A methodological study was used to validate the rubric developed by Lasater to assess clinical judgment during nursing simulation. The first study, by Adamson, assessed the interrater reliability of data produced using the LCJR using intraclass correlation (2,1). @article{Adamson2012AssessingTR, title={Assessing the reliability, validity, and use of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric: three approaches. Internal consistency was obtained for the global instrument (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.899) and for phases of Noticing (α=0.75), Interpreting (α=0.64), Responding (α=0.78) and Reflecting (α=0.63). When the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) was introduced in 2007, it provided a common evaluative language for assessment of clinical judgment but had limited support of its validity and reliability. Concern with patient safety necessitates valid and reliable measures to evaluate clinical judgment. www.e-chnr.org [Kostenfrei] There … Methods: Methodological design study conducted at a public institution of higher education in the southeast region of Brazil. The purpose of this method article was to translate, conduct a relevance evaluation and reliability test of the identified Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR). Methods: A nts. Journal of Nursing Education, 46(11), 496-503 National League for Nursing. N2 - Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric - Brazilian Version in a sample of nursing students. Conclusion: The evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the rubric showed evidence of reliability and construct validity of the instrument for measuring the development of nursing students’ clinical judgment. Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric - Brazilian Version in a sample of nursing students. It was initiated after the agreement of using the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric by the Brazilian version authors (8) ... 27. - 21(2015), 2, Seite 160-167, doi.org [Kostenfrei] / Morais, Sheila Coelho Ramalho Vasconcelos; Nunes, Janaina Gomes Perbone; Lasater, Kathie; De Barros, Alba Lúcia Bottura Leite; De Carvalho, Emilia Campos. Morais, S. C. R. V., Nunes, J. G. P., Lasater, K., De Barros, A. L. B. L., & De Carvalho, E. C. (2018). Preliminarily, was analyzed the clarity of behaviors described by eight students in each level of the 11 dimensions of the instrument. Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric - Brazilian Version in a sample of nursing students. The LCJR evaluates expected student performance according to Tanner’s four phases of clinical judgment (noticing, interpreting, responding, and reflecting) at various levels. Purpose: This study was done to evaluate the Lasater Clinical Judgement Rubric for use with Korents. Preliminarily, was analyzed the clarity of behaviors described by eight students in each level of the 11 dimensions of the instrument. The following psychometric properties were analyzed: discriminant validity, reliability and dimensionality. @article{ededec40c46e4d388ed3d6058fee1057. Copyright: Primary Sidebar. Methods: A nts. publisher = "Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo", https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0194201800038. Conclusion: Results of the study indicate that the rubric shows acceptable reliability and validity in Korean nursing students. Factor analysis showed that noticing, responding, and reflecting domains had Eigen values of 2.669, 1.991, and 2.912, respectively and were bound, but unlike the original tool in which four factors noticing, interpretation, responding, and reflecting domains were bound. Participants were 34 nursing students at K... Full description. Methods: A methodological study was used to validate the rubric developed by Lasater to assess clinical judgment during nursing simulation. All of the items 2007). UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053027733&partnerID=8YFLogxK, UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053027733&partnerID=8YFLogxK, Powered by Pure, Scopus & Elsevier Fingerprint Engine™ © 2021 Elsevier B.V, "We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. Professor, School of Nursing; 503-494-8325; Biography . The purpose of this article is to summarize the methods and findings from three different approaches examining the reliability and validity of data from the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) using human patient simulation. Internal consistency was obtained for the global instrument (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.899) and for phases of Noticing (α=0.75), Interpreting (α=0.64), Responding (α=0.78) and Reflecting (α=0.63). doaj.org [Kostenfrei] note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 Departamento de Enfermagem/Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo. DOI: 10.3928/01484834-20111130-03 Corpus ID: 9533163. Next, was collection of data on the evaluation of psychometric properties with self-application by 179 students. Clinical judgment has been identified as a critical component of professional nursing practice and enables nurses to deliver safe patient care with optimal outcomes. Clinical judgment development: Using simulation to create an assessment rubric. Preliminarily, was analyzed the clarity of behaviors described by eight students in each level of the 11 dimensions of the instrument. journal = "ACTA Paulista de Enfermagem". Results: Through the Brazilian version of the rubric were differentiated the two groups of students (p-value <0.05) in the 11 dimensions evaluated. T1 - Reliability and validity of the lasater clinical judgment rubric – Brazilian version, AU - Morais, Sheila Coelho Ramalho Vasconcelos, AU - De Barros, Alba Lúcia Bottura Leite. abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric - Brazilian Version in a sample of nursing students. The Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR), which is based on the Tanner Clinical Judgment Model, was developed in response to an identified need for a standard evaluative language to discuss clinical judgment with students in the simulation setting. The content validity score was 83%, establishing the appropriateness and readiness of the tool. AB - Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric - Brazilian Version in a sample of nursing students. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 7(36), 1-17. doi: 10.2202/1548-923X.2026 Lasater, K. (2007). Methods: Methodological design study conducted at a public institution of higher education in the southeast region of Brazil. Morais SCRV, Nunes JGP, Lasater K, De Barros ALBL, De Carvalho EC. Stability was verified by test-retest (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient – ICC: 0.88). Stability was verified by test-retest (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient – ICC: 0.88). The rubric was validated using the exploratory factor analysis and content validity. The rubric contains four domains of competency: systematic patient assessment, clinical response, clinical-psychomotor skills, and communication proficiency. All rights reserved. Internal consistency was obtained for the global instrument (Cronbach{\textquoteright}s alpha: 0.899) and for phases of Noticing (α=0.75), Interpreting (α=0.64), Responding (α=0.78) and Reflecting (α=0.63). Journal toc [Kostenfrei]. Participants were 34 nursing students at K University in Seoul. © 2018 Departamento de Enfermagem/Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo. OBJECTIVES: Therefore, this study aimed to validate the Korean language version of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR), a clinical judgment tool currently used in nursing simulation research and English speaking nursing societies. When the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) was introduced in 2007, it provided a common evaluative language for assessment of clinical judgment but had limited support of its validity and reliability. Between February and May, 2012, analysis was done of 91 video clips recording performance during simulation. (2013) evaluated senior nursing students in a high-fidelity simulator lab equipped with hospital equipment and computerized charting via a laptop. OBJECTIVES: Therefore, this study aimed to validate the Korean language version of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR), a clinical judgment tool currently used in nursing simulation research and English speaking nursing societies. When the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) was introduced in 2007, it provided a common evaluative language for assessment of clinical judgment but had limited support of its validity and reliability. It has been found to be … keywords = "Nursing education, Nursing students, Psychometry, Validation studies". The purpose of this article is to summarize the methods and findings from three different approaches examining the reliability and validity of data from the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) using human patient simulation. , based on the verification of its reliability and validity. The virtual patient version of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (vpLCJR) is designed to deconstruct different aspects of clinical reasoning in nursing and provide students and educators with a defined set of performance criteria and expectation of what the students should achieve during virtual patient activities. The Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric, a validated, evidence-based clinical judgment rubric, is described as a tool that offers a common language for students, nurse educators, and preceptors and a trajectory for students’ clinical judgment development. }, author={K. Adamson and Paula Gubrud and Stephanie A Sideras and K. Lasater}, … Lasater’s Clinical Judgment Rubric was developed based on Tanner’s clinical judgement model and translated into Korean by Shin et al. Stability was verified by test-retest (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient – ICC: 0.88). Procedure A 4-year baccalaureate nursing program, with students taking clinical courses in the last 2 years of the program, initiated simulation as an integral part of the curriculum. However, few studies have assessed the validity and reliability of these tools. The discriminant validity of the factorial model by the Fornell-Larcker criterion and cross loadings confirmed the theoretical structure of the rubric original version. Morais, Sheila Coelho Ramalho Vasconcelos ; Nunes, Janaina Gomes Perbone ; Lasater, Kathie ; De Barros, Alba Lúcia Bottura Leite ; De Carvalho, Emilia Campos. Participants were grouped in junior (1st and 2nd terms n=115) and senior (3rd and 4th terms n=64) students. Conclusion: The evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the rubric showed evidence of reliability and construct validity of the instrument for measuring the development of nursing students’ clinical judgment. Background The development and assessment of clinical judgment ability are essential in nursing education. Results: Through the Brazilian version of the rubric were differentiated the two groups of students (p-value <0.05) in the 11 dimensions evaluated. Preliminarily, was analyzed the clarity of behaviors described by eight students in each level of the 11 dimensions of the instrument. The LCJR is frequently used in simulation research could be consistently measuring the wrong thing. Results: Findings showed reliability and validity of the rubric. Reliability and validity of the lasater clinical judgment rubric – Brazilian version. Results: Through the Brazilian version of the rubric were differentiated the two groups of students (p-value <0.05) in the 11 dimensions evaluated. Methods: Methodological design study conducted at a public institution of higher education in the southeast region of Brazil. When the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) was introduced in 2007, it provided a comm … Simulation is integrated into nursing curricula as a means of developing and evaluating clinical judgment, but there are few valid and reliable tools available and evaluation is not consistently theory based. In this article the Swedish translation LCJR (S) is presented. NLN Simulation Design Effectiveness Tool nln-instrument_simulation-design-scale . The discriminant validity of the factorial model by the Fornell-Larcker criterion and cross loadings confirmed the theoretical structure of the rubric original version. unsafe nursing students in clinical learning. 2012;51(2):66-73. The first study, by Adamson, assessed the interrater reliability of data produced using the LCJR using intraclass correlation (2,1). Adamson KA, Gubrud P, Sideras S, Lasater K. Assessing the reliability, validity, and use of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric: three approaches. However, few studies have assessed the validity and reliability of these tools. You do not seem to be in the local network of the institution. Development of the Clinical Learning Environment Comparison Survey. My primary goal in nursing education is to prepare students to become excellent clinical thinkers through the integration of theory, research, and pedagogy. The following psychometric properties were analyzed: discriminant validity, reliability and dimensionality. /. Next, was collection of data on the evaluation of psychometric properties with self-application by 179 students. The aim of this research was to investigate the inter-rater reliability of data from the DARE2. Integrative learning through simulation and problem-based learning, Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(2), e47-e54. (2018). Participants were grouped in junior (1st and 2nd terms n=115) and senior (3rd and 4th terms n=64) students. J Nurs Educ. The following psychometric properties were analyzed: discriminant validity, reliability and dimensionality. Results: Through the Brazilian version of the rubric were differentiated the two groups of students (p-value <0.05) in the 11 dimensions evaluated. This evaluation tool for nursing simulation allows nursing faculty to objectively evaluate students’ clinical judgment as well as students to reflect on their clinical judgment process during simulation.. Kaka Shim [Author] At the end of the study time frame, a focus group of 8 of the observed students was convened to further test the findings. This study focused on determining the psychometric properties of the virtual patient version of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric, a rubric that is aimed at assessing nursing students' clinical reasoning processes when encountering virtual patients. Dimensionality validity by confirmatory factorial analysis (CFA) obtained results of composite reliability (CR) above 0.7, and average variance extracted (AVE) higher than 0.5 in all phases. doi = "10.1590/1982-0194201800038". This was a quasi-experimental, within-subjects, one-group design study. Next, was collection of data on the evaluation of psychometric properties with self-application by 179 students. Sheila Coelho Ramalho Vasconcelos Morais, Janaina Gomes Perbone Nunes, Kathie Lasater, Alba Lúcia Bottura Leite De Barros, Emilia Campos De Carvalho, Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review. Methods: Methodological design study conducted at a public institution of higher education in the southeast region of Brazil. Communication Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR). Assessing the reliability, validity, and use of the Lasater clinical judgment rubric: Three approaches.